<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Question for NASA TOM.</title>
        <description> Yesterday I was hunting a local school yard with my Deus 2 in a light rain.I noticed that I could run my sensitivity a couple of numbers higher than usual. Does rain nullify some EMI?</description>
        <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187112#msg-187112</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.23</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187174#msg-187174</guid>
            <title>Re: Question for NASA TOM.</title>
            <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187174#msg-187174</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the reply. Something else some old hunters used to tell me that I never put much stock in was that they had their best hunts when they could see the moon overhead. Any thoughts.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Shakydigger</dc:creator>
            <category>Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187170#msg-187170</guid>
            <title>Re: Question for NASA TOM.</title>
            <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187170#msg-187170</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I&#039;ve been offline for over a week......out-of-Country. Slow to respond!<br />
<br />
In addition to information already given.............. rain can &#039;alter&#039; how surrounding powerlines emit. In my locale....... rain washes off salt coatings that collect on powerlines........ &#039;changing&#039; how they generate EMI. Usually for-the-better.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>NASA-Tom</dc:creator>
            <category>Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187152#msg-187152</guid>
            <title>Re: Question for NASA TOM.</title>
            <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187152#msg-187152</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Is Tom here?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Shakydigger</dc:creator>
            <category>Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 12:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187135#msg-187135</guid>
            <title>Re: Question for NASA TOM.</title>
            <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187135#msg-187135</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ UKD2User Wrote:<br />
-------------------------------------------------------<br />
&gt; Hi - I&#039;m obviously not Tom ( :) ) but I think you<br />
&gt; might be on to something.  A lot of EMI nowadays i<br />
&gt; s in the wavebands used by WiFi/BlueTooth - 2.4GHz<br />
&gt; - which happens to be around the frequency(ies) ab<br />
&gt; sorbed quite strongly by water molecules (hence th<br />
&gt; e principle of operation for microwave cooking etc<br />
&gt; .).  It stands to reason, as I see it, that damp a<br />
&gt; ir will absorb more EMI at those particular freque<br />
&gt; ncies than dry air.  I guess that every situation<br />
&gt; is unique, so the extent to which this would be he<br />
&gt; lpful is impossible to estimate.<br />
&gt; <br />
&gt; [<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_abso"  rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org</a>]<br />
&gt; rption_by_water<br />
<br />
That is an interesting idea!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Shelton</dc:creator>
            <category>Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187122#msg-187122</guid>
            <title>Re: Question for NASA TOM.</title>
            <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187122#msg-187122</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi - I&#039;m obviously not Tom ( :) ) but I think you might be on to something.  A lot of EMI nowadays is in the wavebands used by WiFi/BlueTooth - 2.4GHz - which happens to be around the frequency(ies) absorbed quite strongly by water molecules (hence the principle of operation for microwave cooking etc.).  It stands to reason, as I see it, that damp air will absorb more EMI at those particular frequencies than dry air.  I guess that every situation is unique, so the extent to which this would be helpful is impossible to estimate.<br />
<br />
[<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_absorption_by_water"  rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org</a>]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>UKD2User</dc:creator>
            <category>Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187112#msg-187112</guid>
            <title>Question for NASA TOM.</title>
            <link>http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,187112,187112#msg-187112</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yesterday I was hunting a local school yard with my Deus 2 in a light rain.I noticed that I could run my sensitivity a couple of numbers higher than usual. Does rain nullify some EMI?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Shakydigger</dc:creator>
            <category>Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
