Please delete this post....

Mike in CO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> midalake Wrote:
> >
> > With the Tarsacci can you pick a frequenc
> y.
>
> The Equinox can also pick a single frequenc
> y.
> (It can be run in EITHER multifreq OR single freq.
> )
>
> > WHY, WHY was a "Nickle" tested against an Equino
> x
> > and not a gold ring?????
> > HH Dave
>
> Because there is no such thing as a standard gold
> ring.
> There is such a thing as a standard nickel. (...an
> d they're cheaper, too, lol.)
> And .... most importantly .... because it works!
>
> We've been using nickels as a substitute for gold
> rings in detector tests for at least 50 years that
> I know of.
> If it were not a good gold substitute, we would ha
> ve stopped testing with them decades ago.

Your reply is a complete cop out. .

Two [or more] detectors, same spot, same ring. ALL CONSTANTS

Even becomes MORE IMPORTANT when comparing two different platforms. EX. VLF VS PI.

Just because "you" have been doing it for 50 years that way does not make it correct in 2020 !



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/25/2020 12:18PM by midalake.

But WHAT IF.

What if a gold ring is selected (out of a batch of many gold rings)……. that is more easily detected by one detector...over the other detector. This would be a unsuspecting 'bias' for one of the detectors.

Hence; a STANDARDIZED NICKEL!!!

midalake Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Your reply is a complete cop out. .
>
> Just because "you" have been doing it for 50 years
> does not make it correct!

I was just trying to help you understand why we do it the way we do.

Just because "you" don't understand it does not make it wrong!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/25/2020 11:58AM by Mike in CO.

NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But WHAT IF.
>
> What if a gold ring is selected (out of a batch of
> many gold rings)……. that is more easily detected b
> y one detector...over the other detector. This wou
> ld be a unsuspecting 'bias' for one of the detecto
> rs.
>
> Hence; a STANDARDIZED NICKEL!!!


TAKE 3 DIFFERENT GOLD RINGS THEN

You know EXACTLY what the term platforms mean too!

Some people are tone deaf. No mater what you try to say, explain or to be helpful they always have an argument against it, not a civil argument but a cantankerous one and normally don't have anything meaningful to contribute. They can be picked out on different forums as they like to frequent forums with the same names with the same rhetoric. I'll normally do a quick scan of their post and if I see it is headed in a direction that is not to my interest I'll move on. One thing I've learned is not to feed them which is their desire allowing them to fester and of coarse I appreciate those that do try to post helpful information.

El

Before I let the stuck in the mud boomers go for the day.

If I were to do a head to head comparison with the Tarsacci and Equinox on a gold chain for depth. Should the chain be made of Nickle?

BTW Does anyone know of any gold chain Vids for the Tarsacci?

You never even made it to the mud yet, midalake.
I'm not one to call people numbskulls. ... . except when they deserve it. I'm not the brightest bulb myself and know I am what I am with a not so good short term memory. So I try to refrain when people don't get it.

Standard = Serving as or conforming to an established or accepted measurement or value.

What is more uniform in composition, volume and weight, US nickels or gold rings?

Wonder if you'll get this question right......What weighs less, a pound of feathers or a one pound chicken?

calabash digger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I see all the claims that are being made about how
> good the Tarsacci is in iron and it has me scratch
> ing my head....
>
> Took two years to figure this out??
>
> Keith you are making some claims about the perform
> ance of this machine in iron....please show us a f
> ew digs in the field....the parlor tricks are grea
> t and all....video a few real digs in the iron on
> your civil war sites...
>
> I got a good mind to drop my $1500 bucks on this u
> nit...If I do and I find out its nothing more than
> a hype game I am gonna be pissed!
>
> I saw (Keith ) make claims about the vista gold ga
> in being the best in iron he ever used and also t
> he claims about the Vista X and they have both die
> d and went to the metal detector grave yard..never
> to be heard from again.....HYPE....
>
> Someone needs to put this up in a head to head wit
> h the Deus and Equinox...even the Vista machines
> would work.
>
> Time will reveal all about this unit .....is it ju
> st another fleece job???
>
> WE SHALL SEE!!

Maybe Keith has a full time job. You seem to have unlimited time for detecting. You former Navy?

Struck a nerve with a member. It was an expected reply.

coinspader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know what video's you are watching Calabas
> h, I have tried a lot of the detectors Keith has d
> emonstrated in his video's and what he says about
> them rings true. I have purchased and still own so
> me of them.


i have watched keith's videos, and he shows it all! "warts and all!"
he tells it "straight!" no bullshit!

(h.h.!)
j.t.

Gold chains I’ve found the last 3 years (12 I think) on the MDT hit between the digits 1 and 3.

dewcon4414 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gold chains I’ve found the last 3 years (12 I thin
> k) on the MDT hit between the digits 1 and 3.

How long have you owned the MDT?

For the record. For those that don’t know. NASA Tom greenlighted Tarsacci release on Dec 11, 2018.
Here is thread/post where he did this.
So so-called general public folks (purchasers of units) have around 18 months max time of possession of the units.
[www.dankowskidetectors.com]



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 07/26/2020 02:52AM by tnsharpshooter.

Ive owned it 18 mos..... and owned the Nox every since it came out as well. It was a learning experience since i believe i was the only guy at the time IN the water with the machine.