Tom

My son in law bought the E-Trac and I can see this type of machine would be a lot of help to a scientist. It analysis the targets according to composition of iron and other metals. I read through the manual and can say it's a complicated challenge especially for a novice.

nt



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/10/2009 09:53AM by Jackpine.

posted in wrong thread

Ahhhhh......... The epitome of K.I.S.S. theory.......... and the justification thereof. Yes, the Explorer is a spectacular unit.....and a industry leader in certain applications; yet, I have always felt (and especially with a lot of the White's units) that they are TOO complex......irt the amount/volumes of menus/pages. Then........ there's the other end of the spectrum....,,,,,,, that being the Troy, Fisher, Nautilus...and a few other units. Only a couple/few knobs/adjustments..... and these units will match (if not exceed) the performance levels of the mega-menu detectors. Hair-splitting ID accuracy, in theory, sounds spectacular...and is neat to demonstrate on a bench,,,,,in a textbook perfect environment; yet, in the real world..... it's just simply not quite that critical...... nor ascertainable (due to TOO many variables).

Tom