Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software used for this forum being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum based Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is no longer accepting new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences. This Phorum based discussion forum will still be here for reference and veiwing, but will be closed for further posts.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Page 1 of 7
Pages: 12345
Results 1 - 30 of 196
GTer Wrote:
Vlad still working on forum, progress being made..
Here is a link explaining what happened..
Good to hear as I only visit here, DP, FMDF, and my Forums at AHRPS. And there are several individuals not approved or banned to help keep things clean and not annoying.
Monte
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Dan(NM) Wrote:
I hunt really trashy parks and hardly ever go after nickels because my time is limited. I'm going to notch in 12-13 on my next hunt due to amount of wheats and silver I've been taking out of 2 places I've hit this past month. Have you found the Nox the hit nickels in this range at depth, I'm talking 7-9" depth, that's where most of the keepers are
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteShelton Very good reply Monty. Thank you. With your nail board test I was find also one more issue. Overall performance effect depends from kind of coin... with silver will be different than with copper. Some YouTube showman’s use 3D tests. But for me I prefers your.Shelton, 'Thank You' for the kind words.
I do several different Good-Target / Trash-Target testing when I am eval
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteD&P-OR Monte-----How did you find the Apex with the "Viper" coil to do on your nail board test in comparison to the F-19 with the FT 5X10" coil? (both coils being comparatively close to same size)----- Looked to me like the F-19 literally "ate the Apex for lunch" on the test I seen.---------DelHummm, let me address this question this way:
1.. I own, use and li
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Let me jump in here just a little bit, if you don't mind. One thing I have always noticed on many of the posts here on Tom's site is that there are a lot of bellyachers who are quick to offer all their negative thoughts because something new or different isn't what they consider to be the right pick for them and their needs. The percentage of complainers who do so tend to be thos
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteNASA-Tom:
Monte....... just a thought:
The Nokta Impact (and all of it's succedent siblin gs) had a fairly large 11" x 7" coil size....... and performed phenomenally well in iron. The EQX with an even larger (11" x 11") coil .... also performs stupendously well in iron..... for its coil size. The Microprocessor/electronics are (now) performing additional duties in
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
By this time next week I'll know how the new Apex performs for a variety of applications, but I won't know for sure how it will handle really challenging places with dense brush, building rubble and abundant close-proximity ferrous debris until they bring out a smaller-size coil for it. It might be a narrow-shaped coil, but it is still a mid-big coils, being more of a mid-size to bigge
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteGeoW:
This is the oldtimer coming out in me but I can’t make myself stand over a good sounding target trying to get some numbers to agree.
I dig the target after Xing it’s location then onto the next.
Time is relics
G
I'm with you on this one, George. Way too many years of success using non-display detectors and relying on a decent, dig-worthy' audio response. If I'
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Sven1 Wrote:
Yeah Monte, at least we got partly what were asking for.
I have been posting that everyone who wants a 5" coil to ask for one. Hopefully enough people will give that push and actually want to buy one. Back on the UK forum to get some info on an older
detector......they have a Simplex sub-forum. Mentioned about the 5", might some extra push there as well. As they h
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
tnsharpshooter Wrote: Or help put White’s out of business.
White's put their self out of business. No senior, skilled electronics engineer since Carl M. left. Went through a few CEO's who were there briefly, then that task was handled by the main Accountant. Already had a few rush-to-market mistakes before the MX Sport, then really made things worse when it hadn't been evalu
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Gonebeepin' George,
I think the Impact has proved itself as very capable. I wasn't a fan of the Impact ergonomics. A friend brought over his pre-production model for me to have a look at and test in the back yard. Uncomfortable in hand. Lots of 'modes' to experiment with. Excellent performer. But I would have been looking at ways to make it more comfortable to use from th
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
D&P-OR: That isn't what Monte wanted!
Del, it is partly what I wanted. I have WANTED or ASKED FOR or nearly BEGGED FOR a 5" DD for the nasty iron contaminated sites, and a good mid-size coil such as a 7" Concentric or 5X9½ DD open-frame. They already said they can't make a Concentric for the Simplex + (although I don't know why not) so the 5X9½ DD is definitely
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Aaron, 'Thank You' for a nice walk down 'memory lane' and I was glad to know that choice-condition Mark I Ltd. was going to a home of a caring individual. Too many 'newcomers' don't know about, thus don't have an appreciation for, some of the really nice detectors we have enjoyed through the decades-past. It was nice seeing and hearing it again.
Monte
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
"Relic Hunting" can mean different thing to different people. My primary-use Relic Hunting detectors and coils for very challenging sites that have a very dense amount of iron nails and other ferrous-based junk are the: Nokta FORS CoRe w/'OOR' DD coil and FORS Relic w/5" DD coil • the XP ORX w/5X9½ DD HF coil • and a DeepTech Vista 'X' w/5.7 DD coil.
Sites
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteHarold,ILLMonte, Is the Pantera also a ED-165 Disc.?Harold, good question and a simple answer ... NO. The Pantera is NOT an ED-165 range of Acceptance and is considered one of the Tesoro models labeled as having the ED-120 Disc. circuitry. The Pantera essentially does have the ED-120 circuitry and the performance like most of the other ED-120 Disc. models, but technically, it is just very
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Harold, for the benefit of those readers who don't understand what the ED-120 and ED-180 or other references relate to with the Tesoro metal detector line, let me make a quick explanation:
Early-on, after we got Discriminating detectors in the early '70s, the use was to ignore or Discriminate the more annoying pieces of trash Coin Hunters encountered. The bulk of that common urban t
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Sorry, but I can't believe how many readers are so quick to question or get picky about this new (coming soon) device. Most of the information was right there in the available ads by clicking on Specifications and other attached info.
Operating Frequency: It states 12 kHz.
This is different from all the other more recent and popular models Nokta and/or Makro have offered the past fiv
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Nice orange color, but I'm with you, Sven .... I'll be glad when the Simplex is released.
I believe it will be one more shock to the metal detector industry, especially here in the USA. In the last year we've seen one ship sunk, one is listing, and another seems to have been adrift for quite a while. FTP is about the only US detector maker who seems to at least keep offering u
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
A very successful couple of hunts! I have a selection of very good units, and have owned a half-dozen different T2 versions, then last month I bought a new T2+ that I am also quite satisfied with. Half the cost, or less, than most of those newer entries that have a wide-array of adjustment features ... most of which I don't need. It looks like we have a short break coming in from our retu
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Quotejmarytthey attempted to compete with garrett by offering the mx-5,but they "screwed up" because it wasn't waterproof,and the at-pro is!
The MX-5 wasn't an attempt to compete with the waterproof AT Pro. The MX-5 was, and is, a very decent performing model, and a bit hotter than the M-6. I used to keep it and another brand/model with me for Coin Hunting as I liked them mo
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
A bit windy but successful all-the-same. Sure wish we could venture out around here.
Remember the WTHO's in May and June, and I hope to see you there.
Monte
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Quotejmarytyup! i remember those days when whitey, i believe, gave 40% discount to dealers if they bought in "bulk" i don't remember the exact number, but think it was 10..40% was a tremendous incentive both to dealers, and customers.I started as a Dealer w/Garrett in '77 and their discount back then was 25%. That increased and about 1981 to '83 most Dealers were getting
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Well, maybe if I jump in here I can answer a few of the questions I've read, satisfy some curiosities, and perhaps bring this thread to an end. Some of the responders I have met and known for quite some years, others I have had interesting phone calls and e-mails with related to this fantastic hobby we enjoy, and others I have followed on a regular bases as I do a lot more forum reading tha
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteD&P-ORMonte------Have you tried the XP Deus?Tried it? Kind of, but really just used one a very short while a friend uses to check out a few targets. I never got into studying it or borrow one to use for any extended period of time.
QuoteD&P-ORIf so, what did you think of it in mineralized/iron plaqued sites? Did it pass your nail board test with say the 9" coil on board?
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteAaron... hard to see w these 50 yr eyes in candle light! I wish my eyes, either of them, could still see like when I was 50. That many years back triggers a few memories for me. That year included my '04' day at a Central Oregon small town highway renovation. They started tearing up the highway through town on a Monday that summer, as well as the sidewalks from building-front ac
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuoteAaronHey Monte,
Way back in 2010 on Finds you responded to a PANTERA question with the following comment:
QuoteMonte “You can opt to use the Notch Accept or Notch Reject to accept ONLY those targets within the notched range, or IGNORE (Reject or Discriminate) targets in that 'window.' Better still, you can just rely on the Primary Discriminate control (which I left at the mi
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuotecoinspaderThanks for the input Monte, the fact that it will sound off on everything might be hard on the ears without a way to reduce the sound of the iron grunts.
Might not be an ideal machine for coin shooting in a trashy park.
Nope, not a pleasant model for the majority of Coin Hunters, or many other folks for that matter. If a site is pretty much iron debris free, it would ease the au
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuotecoinspaderAnybody here ever use one? I guess they were a limited edition from what I have read about them. There is one for sale, I was thinking about trying it out.If you want to try out a Sierra Super Trac, aka SST, before you invest any $$$, just get a White's Matrix 6, better known as the M6, and do the following:
• You will only have use of the Sensitivity or Gain control to tur
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
You have a lot of useful information from responders.
QuoteJunk and DisorderlyI would have said it was more about the coil size than the detector, some specific detector are better than others, but for me when i hunt in thick iron or trashy sites then only a small coil will do the job and i mean small in the 4-6'' size. If i suspect that decent targets are around then i will clean
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
QuotetabmanI've used numerous Teknetics and haven't had any problems with them whatsoever. I love the T-grip.I've only encountered a couple of glitches, but nothing major as I have from some other manufacturers here in the USA. The T-2 grip is one of the best out there and I have enjoyed in on the T2's, Omega's and G2's I have or have had in the past. Very comforta
by
Monte
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Page 1 of 7
Pages: 12345