Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software used for this forum being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum based Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is no longer accepting new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences. This Phorum based discussion forum will still be here for reference and veiwing, but will be closed for further posts.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Page 3 of 3
Pages: 123
Results 61 - 69 of 69
Whitaker Electronics, Dallas, TX, is a long-time Fisher Repair Center. I have had several machines calibrated there. Their no. is 972-329-0024. .They do good work but it may take a little while. Frank
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Thanks, Jeb,that's simple enough.It would appear that using only one tone in conjunction with the meter would be the simpliest of all scenarios, thereby eliminating a lot of time-consuming decision making. If it registers within your dig paramters, dig it. Also, would not a smaller coil present less masking of adjacent targets than a large windshield-wiper coil? Makes sense to me, especially
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom, I am somewhat confused about all these tones. If you are digging all tones above iron, why could you not just set your discrim at a point at which a 3" nail is eliminated and then dig everything else ? This would eliminate a lot of the dig/not dig decisions and speed up your hunting time. The Shadow X-5 and the Tejon are very fast response machines and would seemingly work as well in t
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom, thanks-since its too hot here in TX to do much detecting, these referrals will give me something to do indoors-thanks again. Frank
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom, what, if any, are the depth advantages of an F-75 over a CZ-70? I haave used the CZ line for years but would upgrade IF I could be convinced the monetary outlay would get me more/better depth and performance. Your input is sorely needed. Frank L/TX
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom, how would you compare the CZ-5 to the MXT as to depth? I realize parameters for comparison must be equal, but just in general for coin-hunting.
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I think that the video was great but a couple of minor points-not wearing gloves is a serious error (needles,glass,etc.) and the size of your shovel would probably get me arrested in Texas-our ground in the Dallas area is so hard never would you get a plug like yours out-narrow bladed tools are the norm-thanks for emphasizing covering the hole even when no one cares-great point-was that a CZ-5 yo
by
Texasdirtdauber
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Page 3 of 3
Pages: 123