Thomas Dankowski's Metal Detecting Forum

Todd and JCR... I think you have a really good idea how to test/detect under an iron carpet to work properly... Your information is really informative.. It is not only the result of the test itself that is important...but we also get important information about what settings the detector can optimal...

I'm glad you're back on the Forum, Mr. Dankowski...

..I'm very glad that Mr. Dankowski is okay.

I believe that Jack will do a similar test of these two Dual mode detectors with targets between iron.

A demonstration of work and actually a test of two modern detectors with Dual MODE option ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6JsPnthO3s

I also hope... that Mr. Dankowski is healthy and well.

Good video David,, Deus2 can be a bit shallower at reactivity 3..at 2.5..it is more optimal when you are looking for deeper targets..especially when you are using audio pitch...which weakens strongly with the depth of the target...it all depends on the size of the target and its depth...it is often ...

David, your tests from the CTX 3030 will be interesting...,, also because it has different settings than the Etrac... Clearly, the CTX is very good at eliminating surface iron.... On deep, some deep iron, the signal can already be variable.

JCR we are waiting for further information about the New Tarsac XD..in your demanding terrains..

Yes, everything is based on physics..because a small coil can receive a 10..x stronger signal to a nearby target...like say an 11" coil.. A years ago I saw a very nice graph of different sized coils..on Geotech1..which pointed out this fact..That also means a small coil it10x stronger signal fr...