Manticore vs tarsacci high mineral dirt?

This is an open discussion forum about metal detecting. Please be generally polite and respectful. Please note that Dankowski Detectors now has Terms of Use provisions. Nothing has really changed, its just now everything is written down for the sake of those who in the past liked to argue. If anybody sees anything unreasonable or disagreeable in the Terms of Use, please let me know.
Post Reply
Pedlar mills
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:33 pm

Manticore vs tarsacci high mineral dirt?

Post by Pedlar mills »

In high mineral red dirt as in 4 and 5 bar on a t2 which machine would perform the best between the manticore or the new tarsacci? Have seen a lot of info on the manticore but not much info on the new tarsacci. Still trying to save up enough spare money for a new detector and was curious
NASA-Tom
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:04 am

Re: Manticore vs tarsacci high mineral dirt?

Post by NASA-Tom »

I would more-so lean towards the Tarsacci.......... for bad/severe dirt. 5-bar and above.
User avatar
JCR
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:00 pm
Location: East Texas, USA

Re: Manticore vs tarsacci high mineral dirt?

Post by JCR »

The Tarsacci really just starts to shine as ground conditions get bad. On a difficult site, the Tarsacci will hit solid on targets the top SMF units miss. The adjustable AM channel volume & adjustable Tones really helps good targets stand out.
Chris
Post Reply