Page 2 of 4
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2024 10:37 am
by au pirata
Would you say, ATLC running at sensitivity of 18,would hit sub gram gold,better than AT DEEP running sensitivity 20...
I cannot run ATLC any higher GREY SAND,IN THE WATER..
the equinox I could run beach 1 sensitivity 18..
11 inch coil..M8 not available here in Mediterranean country...thanks mike.
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2024 2:59 pm
by Bklein
Two evils in detecting, iron and salt. Advancements and tweaks that can help both. As strong as the 40khz hit on the chain is I just wonder if we might have a shot. Just asking why no video showing the hopelessness of it.
SF is higher power and available in both gold and AT modes…
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2024 12:43 pm
by NASA-Tom
au ........ Your ATLC w/Sens 18.............. VS..............Your AT DEEP w/Sens 20 , . , . , . , . comes out to nearly identical performance on tiny low conductors. Now............ when you add saltwater/wet-sand............the BEACH Modes will win......due to PROPER salt phase-angle compensation (((assuming you Ground Balance to the wet-salt))).
Barry........yes. I DREAM OF using a 40-Khz non-salt mode in the wet-salt/sand!!! But....... the extreme high-conductivity of wet-salt poses blowback/flyback/feedback that is fatally insurmountable. AND (to make it worse) tiny gold jewelry ID's in the exact same ID range as saltwater! Sooooooo......... this is to say: ALL of the gold stud earrings that are lost at the beach.....are stacking up upon each other.......and are undetectable.
There's a reason "WHY" single-freq options are NOT available whilst in any of the Beach Modes.
This thread should have been included/placed on: the Manticore thread.......for consolidation purposes!
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:15 am
by au pirata
Thanks Tom for taking time to answer, I put ATLC by mistake,I ment BEACH LC 18 vs BEACH DEEP..20,
what I don't understand is why it runs sensitivity no better than EQUINOX..this beach has very low wave action, but I believe it has a extremely high salt content,maybe 15% more than Atlantic ocean..
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 7:37 pm
by NASA-Tom
au........ Is this with the M11 coil?
What are your Grnd Bal numbers??
Can you bob/Grnd Balance the unit with about 1/8" of actual water under the coil?
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2024 11:43 pm
by okara gold
Tom... I ground balance near the water's edge here on the Gulf side of Fl. Averaging around a #13. Beach LC. The sand is dense and lacking any shells. As I walk up the slope, I start to encounter layers of shells etc. and a GB can be as high as the 30's. Because of this I have been using the auto tracking GB. I have yet to GB out any tiny bits of metal which is good. Do you think this is an acceptable situation using the auto?
In the water I have been alternating between the M8 and M9, with a difference of about 2 sensitivity points between the two. I can run at 24-25 with the 8 and 22-23 with the 9. This is using the surf and seawater mode with your other recommended settings. I like the extra coverage of the 9 and possible depth advantage or do you think the 8 is achieving roughly the same depth and also better sensitivity to the smaller gold? Or is it all a trade off? Thanks
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2024 8:22 am
by au pirata
Yesthis is with 11 inch coil I tried the ground balance before I enter the water,but it becomes unstable after 5 mins,so I ground balance in 1m of water every 30mins,then it becomes very stable, Its a bay beach that I can walk out 100m..
Ground balance numbers in BEACH DEEP 52..
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:37 pm
by NASA-Tom
okara...... your GB numbers sound correct. And............. since your slope is fairly steep.,.,.,., this accounts for better stability in auto-ground-track. I'm still a bit leary of tracking out weak signals whilst in auto-ground-track. Medium & Strong signals ....will not track-out.,.,.,even though the targets may be very small; yet, I have concern of the weak signals.
With the 2-point allowable Sensitivity increase using the M8 coil. , . , . , this makes up for the loss-of-depth to the M9 coil....on coin/ring sized targets; BUT....... the M8 coil will remain more sensitive to smaller gold items! (((You may not want this..... unless you have a good scoop to capture/captivate the tiny targets in the water))).
au...... If you are in a bay whereby ... the water is not crashing; yes!....Ground Balance IN the water. That is your best (most ideal) condition! ((Although a Ground Balance of 52....sure seems high))!!!
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 12:19 am
by okara gold
Thanks for your input, Tom! When I used the Equinox for 5 years, I never used auto tracking on the sand but occasionally did in the water. And when gold hunting out West, I never used auto tracking no matter how hot the ground was as I couldn't take a chance of tuning out the faint targets. Anxious to get back at it tomorrow1
Re: Tom D... Any new thoughts?
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2024 11:28 pm
by okara gold
I used the M8 today in the saltwater and was running sensitivity around 23 / 24. Good target on this 18k open earring, weighing 1.7 grams.
The M8 certainly likes the small stuff. Trying to size things to be accepted on the forum

- 18k earring1ab.JPEG (223.3 KiB) Viewed 5590 times