Page 1 of 1
Manticore and Triple Score compared over junk target using Multi Frequency
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2025 6:46 pm
by Tnsharpshooter
Re: Manticore and Triple Score compared over junk target using Multi Frequency
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:52 am
by NASA-Tom
David......... on your zinc/pot-metal (jagged) piece of metal......... do you think you could "employ" the: DELTA/DIFFERENCES...... that Manticore poses!?!?!?
ALSO........... take a look at the 2D X-Y screen on Manticore....... on that jagged piece of metal. Could THAT data....be employed: out in the field??!!! (((Notice WHAT the 'splatter' looks like. --- Notice WHERE it lands on the 2D screen! Probably NOT fully on the non-ferrous line))).
Re: Manticore and Triple Score compared over junk target using Multi Frequency
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:39 am
by Tnsharpshooter
NASA-Tom wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:52 am
David......... on your zinc/pot-metal (jagged) piece of metal......... do you think you could "employ" the: DELTA/DIFFERENCES...... that Manticore poses!?!?!?
ALSO........... take a look at the 2D X-Y screen on Manticore....... on that jagged piece of metal. Could THAT data....be employed: out in the field??!!! (((Notice
WHAT the 'splatter' looks like. --- Notice
WHERE it lands on the 2D screen! Probably NOT fully on the non-ferrous line))).
Absolutely Tom. Screen plot was terrible sweeping from all directions.
In this test Manticore imo had advantage. Moreso.
You do understand why I put these kinds videos over here.
2 reasons
For the actual users.
And for someone like you and even the manufacturers to see.
One never knows what could be derived from the info/behavior shown.
Re: Manticore and Triple Score compared over junk target using Multi Frequency
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:11 pm
by NASA-Tom
ABSOLUTELY!!!
"Trigger" those engineering brains!