Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum base Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is longer accept new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 - 8 of 8
tnsharpshooter Wrote:
> As far as ferrous ID being different color.
> Be careful what you wish for. All I will/can
> say.
You know, even as I wrote that suggestion it was in my mind that there might be a good reason why this wasn't implemented. It seems too obvious to be something that was just "missed"...
Have you seen something similar?
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
First time out with the Manticore yesterday, so obviously still lots to learn, but WOW, that menu system is a dream!
I found myself configuring settings in the field that I was never confident to tamper with on the Nox without referring to the manual.
I'm especially thinking of the audio configuration and the target tones editor. Impressive!
Big THANK YOU to NASA-TOM (and other contribu
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
KP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> marcomo Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So is the wm-08 still compatible with the Nox 90
> 0/
> > 700?
>
> It is not compatible. As of today there is no wire
> less module for Nox 700/900 or Manticore
I guess what I find most puzzling is that
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
> BUT....... something like the WM-08 idea ((for Man
> ticore)) .....certainly has been tossed around!
Hi Tom
Just my input, but for me a wireless reciever module is *way* higher priority than new coils. It's a requirement to keep the unit usable in windy conditions.
My EQX solution is to wear APTX-LL earbuds (or earbuds wired to the WM-08) under ear defend
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Hi Tom. Are you able to say yet whether the WM-08 module from the EQX is compatible with the Manticore? This was asked further back in the thread but I'm unsure if you missed it or was unable to divulge (which we understand). Thanks!
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 3-to-4 point Sensitivity difference between Be
> ach Mode-1 and Beach Mode-2 is correct. This is no
> rmal.
> ... <snip> ....
> All this info should have been posted....... and s
> hould be consolidated on the Equinox thread!!! (No
> t here!).
Tom, this info should be added to th
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom, what an informative reply, i've learned a great deal by following your posts, thank you for continuing to share your knowledge!
So does it follow that the conductors of the coil cable are also an issue for the reasons you describe?
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How are you guys doing with your 4th Gen (MUU-3) E
> quinox's? I suppose my biggest question is: What d
> o you dislike about the EQX? Would you like to see
> any changes/additions?
> You guys surprised as to 'how many' tilted (or...c
> ompletely on-edge) coins you are finding? Is 50-
by
TimR
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum