Welcome!
» Log In
» Create A New Profile
Here's Some Of The Makro Racer Specifications
Posted by jimmyjiver
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
|
Re: Here's Some Of The Makro Racer Specifications January 21, 2015 05:20AM |
Weight 1.4 kg (3 lbs.) including search coil and batteries !!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/21/2015 05:26AM by Steve Herschbach.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/21/2015 05:26AM by Steve Herschbach.
|
Re: Here's Some Of The Makro Racer Specifications January 21, 2015 05:27AM |
|
Re: Here's Some Of The Makro Racer Specifications January 21, 2015 05:31AM |
|
Re: Here's Some Of The Makro Racer Specifications January 21, 2015 04:10PM |
Most detectors you would have some kind of Bluetooth transmitter that plugs into the headphone jack. The Racer has a module that plugs into the side of the pod, separate from the rear mounted headphone jack. I am not sure exactly how much difference that makes, but it is different.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/21/2015 04:13PM by Steve Herschbach.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/21/2015 04:13PM by Steve Herschbach.
|
Re: Here's Some Of The Makro Racer Specifications January 21, 2015 04:29PM |
Steve Herschbach Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Most detectors you would have some kind of
> Bluetooth transmitter that plugs into the
> headphone jack. The Racer has a module that plugs
> into the side of the pod, separate from the rear
> mounted headphone jack. I am not sure exactly how
> much difference that makes, but it is different.
>
> [www.detectorprospector.com]
> nthly_01_2015/post-1-0-92097900-1421813549.jpg
Different and probably only usable on the Racer
I would prefer the RS 160s so I could use the same phones on different detectors instead. I love consistency in tonal quality and would really like to see a video of the Racer or the CoRe that demonstrate the "fantastic" sounds coming from these contenders when they are 2 or 3 tone units.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Most detectors you would have some kind of
> Bluetooth transmitter that plugs into the
> headphone jack. The Racer has a module that plugs
> into the side of the pod, separate from the rear
> mounted headphone jack. I am not sure exactly how
> much difference that makes, but it is different.
>
> [www.detectorprospector.com]
> nthly_01_2015/post-1-0-92097900-1421813549.jpg
Different and probably only usable on the Racer
I would prefer the RS 160s so I could use the same phones on different detectors instead. I love consistency in tonal quality and would really like to see a video of the Racer or the CoRe that demonstrate the "fantastic" sounds coming from these contenders when they are 2 or 3 tone units.