Air Tests, Test Gardens, find targets in hunted out areas..ect

What I like best and it seems it has to be more true to life situations. Find a good deep target and BEFORE digging it up ,have the other detector try to get a reading of what they think it might or might not be... Then after everyone has there say so DIG. That after a while should tell the REST OF THE STORY...what say about this kind of testing instead of AIR test ect......



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/02/2009 03:57PM by sonny(IN).

Sounds good to me

That is the ture test don't mess with the ground till everyone has a sweep and the dig and see what you have and what all of the detectors thought it might be.

LowBoy

TAKE A LITTLE TIME KICKBACK AND WATCH SOME OF MY DETECTING VIDEO'S BELOW ON YouTube

[www.youtube.com]

If you don’t dig it, then how are you going to know what you’re missing!
How can you have your pudding if you don’t eat your meat!

Air tests are a very good tool.....as most variables are removed. It's a great base-reference that most folks across the world can perform as a 'standard'. ((( Yes, there can be EMI in one location....and a different EMI in a different location ))). BUT,,, YES, the real dirt......in a real setting.....with real world problems included is the true finale, , , hands-down.