Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software used for this forum being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum based Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is no longer accepting new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences. This Phorum based discussion forum will still be here for reference and veiwing, but will be closed for further posts.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 - 7 of 7
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Andrew........ you changed the conditions!!! You u
> sed a Dime now..... instead of a Nickel??? That W
> ILL give completely different results!!!
> The Manticore should do better in 2-bar dirt......
> once it unthaws!
>
> CTGoldman........ Yes. LONG PRESS of the Noise Can
> cel feature on
by
CTGoldman
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom - followup question re: More EMI mitigation = More Depth...does long press noise cancel simply repeat scan the channels that were initially tagged as quiet from "short press" or is something else happening on long press? In other words, is it just ratcheting down onto the most quiet channel on repeated long presses or is there active EMI mitigation being applied? Thanks.
CT
by
CTGoldman
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom - Appreciate the answer to my question on Manticore vs. Nox depth (23% nominal increase basis) The followup post/example was especially helpful. Thanks.
CT
by
CTGoldman
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Joe....... WHAT steveg SAID!
>
> Additional info:
> In Factory Presets...... the Manticore is approx 4
> % better at ID'ing iron............... thus/theref
> ore..........4% less iron-falsing rate.
> BUT......... then you add Ferrous Limits.......Upp
> er & Lower......(and compare
by
CTGoldman
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Can't run the Vanquish in my hot dirt without disc and without notching out a portion of the iron bin due to the lack of a ground balance adjustment (for the life of me I can't understand why ML didn't even include an auto GB feature or at least a settings save on power down feature because having to set that up every time I powered up the Vanquish for each mode was annoying), the
by
CTGoldman
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Having owned both the Excal and the Equinox. I agree with Dew's assessment (the Excal is a money sink if you want to get it customized for optimal use - not really worth it unless you spend most of your time with it submerged, like OBN Joe).
You can get a cheaper 600 "beater" machine new as a backup and dedicate that to the abuse of beach hunting in the water and replace it a
by
CTGoldman
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum