Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software used for this forum being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum based Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is no longer accepting new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences. This Phorum based discussion forum will still be here for reference and veiwing, but will be closed for further posts.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sounds like time to exercise the 5 year warranty (regardless of what other consumer protections you may have in your jurisdiction). I guess the retailer is the first port of call.
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
It's an obvious thought, and I'm sure all the big manufacturers will have thought about it.
Smartphones have a good colour touch screen, plus things like GPS and amazingly powerful processing and are pretty much ubiquitous.
I think the key difficulty is that smartphones use different chipsets and have different internal architectures - even though there are only two or three '
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Thank you Tom. Just to make sure I've not misunderstood, the reason that thirty-party headphones will not inter-operate with the MC is because:
a) No third-party headphones, yet available, correctly(/certifiedly) implement the BlueTooth LE protocols/codecs which, if they did implement them, would allow these phones to inter-operate with the MC, or:
b) ML has decided, for the time bein
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I wanted to ask Tom if he feels able to shed any light on this question...
The hot weather is here, in the northern hemisphere at least, and over-ear headphones are a bit of a sweatbox! I know many people would like to use different wireless headphones from the supplied ML105 phones, for several different reasons. I understand that the MC will also connect with the - physically very similar
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I came to the Deus 2 via the Equinox 800, nearly a year ago now.
I have the bone phones, they are comfortable and they work well - they are primarily intended for use in the water, and only certain tonal options are useable with them.
I use the D2 and my wife uses D2 Lite - these devices do not interfere with each other in any practical situation. The D2 generally copes significantly better
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Hi - I'm obviously not Tom ( ) but I think you might be on to something. A lot of EMI nowadays is in the wavebands used by WiFi/BlueTooth - 2.4GHz - which happens to be around the frequency(ies) absorbed quite strongly by water molecules (hence the principle of operation for microwave cooking etc.). It stands to reason, as I see it, that damp air will absorb more EMI at those particular f
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
First of all, thank you for allowing me to register on this forum, I have been a long-time lurker here.
I would be very interested to hear Tom, or anyone else knowledgeable about this, explain the assertion that the Manticore puts 50% more power into the ground than earlier generations of (Minelab?) SMF detectors. There has already been some discussion of this on the internet, but I think it
by
UKD2User
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum