Why Not Make a Dual Freq. F-75?

NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FTP is indeed working on a new multi-freq
> platform/design......... of which is due out NEXT
> December........ one year from now. This target
> date is 'soft'.....yet, conceptually..... to know
> this project has been underway for some
> time............ and still has substantial time
> remaining..... should speak volumes.


That's a hell of a hold up. I wonder what happened?

I would buy a waterproof to 10ft f75 multi freq detector.
I would be after a CZ type so it can be used in salt I have no interest in picking my freq.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/23/2016 06:03PM by GreenMeanie.

I must have been searching old threads,,didn't mean to resurrect a dead thread,my bad.

------------"Cz's still bad to the bone".------------
Living on a big ass Astroid.
The woman that got my rib,I want it back.

Cal_cobra Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NASA-Tom Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FTP is indeed working on a new multi-freq
> > platform/design......... of which is due out
> NEXT
> > December........ one year from now. This target
> > date is 'soft'.....yet, conceptually..... to
> know
> > this project has been underway for some
> > time............ and still has substantial time
> > remaining..... should speak volumes.
>
>
> That's a hell of a hold up. I wonder what
> happened?


I can only imagine how much further they have gone in 2 years +.
I'd really like my next (and only) machine to be this dual freq they are working on.