F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 19, 2012 07:27PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 2,000 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 19, 2012 11:45PM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 2,251 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 20, 2012 06:20AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,184 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 20, 2012 07:58AM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 172 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 20, 2012 01:10PM |
Registered: 17 years ago Posts: 10,071 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 20, 2012 05:03PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 2,000 |
Hardin county tennessee ??!! ha thats funny i live about a mile from there ! February 20, 2012 06:28PM |
Registered: 14 years ago Posts: 47 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 20, 2012 09:04PM |
Registered: 12 years ago Posts: 552 |
Re: F75 SE: Why did lower sensitivity to 41 reveal more non-ferrous targets? February 21, 2012 01:02AM |
Registered: 13 years ago Posts: 1,184 |