Why were the 1021's hot?

I've searched and can't find the answer. If it was just calibration then Tom could make the new ones just as deep. If it was physical components why would they have changes parts?

Could I get an answer if you know?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/12/2013 06:38PM by Robert.

Tighter tolerances on components, tighter calibration standard, different alignment procedure (supposedly they have gone back to the old procedure), just to name a few things. There are forum members here that are more knowledgeable than me, maybe they will chime in.

I have used both the new and old Fisher rel the CZ units in general and never found much difference, however a lot of fellows were not as lucky...getting poor depth on the newer CZ's not 1021's...( in air tests)

As Tom can not promise a major depth increase no matter what CZ he tunes I would imagine the new Fisher may be using parts from a different manufacturer or for that matter
all CZ's parts or various parts used in conjunction with each other may be the culprit...

Am sure Tom will give an expert answer on this one...

And for what its worth some units will not air test to be depth demons but still get super depth in the field where it counts..

Never saw Beach's post when I typed mine out and he sure worded it much better than I....thru research understand a female tech from the old Fisher really turned out some super hot ones( CZ5's) but don't have a prayer what the ser. #'s were.....

Components maybe but calibration and alignment would be taken care of by TOM , so still not answered.

Components and how they jive with each other rel their tolerances is still open as a possible answer however...otherwise Tom could make any CZ top shelf rel depth and from his posts some just aren't capable...

Dan, I'm guessing you have to right. ????

Correct. Mis-matched hardware that is unable to attain the desired gain.

Robert sorry only have an older Fisher model CZ...none from the new Fisher.....but have used both with approx. the same results....

I think it has been answered.