“Monte's my hero kinda thread”

Hard to see why that is relevant - after all - we only need to spend endless hours looking at horribly produced YouTube videos by folks who are still wet behind the ears when it comes to detector usage and understanding. Lol

Rick Kempf
Gold Canyon AZ- where there is no gold

A tip of the hat to you Monte, I am glad you chose metal detecting for a pass time back in day, we have all benefited from it in one way or another. GL HH

Sven1,

I've been saving what I call Pertinent Posts from this and other forums for a long time and like to refer back to them as occasion permits. A good idea that works for me.


Rich (Utah)






Sven1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL, I sort of do that now, great reference materi
> al to keep re-educating myself with...............
> .....Monte supplied me with most of the catalogs a
> nd info sheets used to make up my website. So I re
> ference that material all the time. Without Monte
> my website would not exist.
>
>
> Tom_in_CA Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I've said it before, and I'll say it again: 100
> y
> > rs. from now, someone's going to collect all of
> Mo
> > nte's posts from archives. And assemble them a
> ll
> > in an index, to have an encyclopedic look at "me
> ta
> > l detecting from the mid 1960s to the 2010s".
> >
> > Not too many people have a nostalgic interest in
> t
> > he formative years of MD'ing evolution (in-so-fa
> r
> > as hobbyist applications go). But for those th
> at
> > do, Monte's "trip down memory lane" is spot on f
> or
> > the evolution stages of BFO (mid 1960s), all-met
> al
> > TRs (early 1970s), TR discriminators (mid to lat
> e
> > 1970s), motion disc (late 1970s). TID (early 19
> 80
> > s), and so forth. And the pro's and con's of e
> ac
> > h step, and individual units, during all those y
> ea
> > rs.
> >
> > Thanx Monte !

------------------------------------------------------------------

Just one more good target before I go.