Welcome! » Log In » Create A New Profile

F75 SE - VS - Garrett AT Pro

Posted by sonny(IN) 
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Re: F75 SE - VS - Garrett AT Pro
February 25, 2011 10:08PM
whites needs to introduce a really deep detector that unmasks well in iron,and make it "simple"
to use,and understand!..they CAN do it,as they have the engineering staff in place,AND deep pockets too!
don't need to offer ten thousand options,just make it powerful,separate well,and go deep!..just sayin!

(h.h.!)
j.t.
Re: F75 SE - VS - Garrett AT Pro
February 25, 2011 11:45PM
see, if you had the AT-Pro you could go out in that rain...........??? ; )
Re: Cal-Cobra
February 26, 2011 12:03AM
Cal_cobra Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't know how far away one needs to be to
> mitigate the EMI crosstalk between machines. The
> MLs don't seem to be effected by the F75. If they
> noise cancel it'll work around the F75 frequency.
>
> I'd love to see First Texas bring out a
> multifreqency machine, or one that's main focus
> was deep coin hunting, they seem to be on a roll
> with relic machines. I'm going to give First
> Texas machines a rest for a while and test out
> some of the other makers. To me part of the fun
> of detecting is seeing who has the better mouse
> trap, competition promotes innovation.

i'm with you cal!..a "lightweight" minelab made by "'fisher!"..(hot damn!)

(h.h.!)
j.t.
Re: F75 SE - VS - Garrett AT Pro
February 26, 2011 01:03AM
Quote
jmaryt
whites needs to introduce a really deep detector that unmasks well in iron,and make it "simple" to use,and understand!...

Can you imagine the demand if Whites released the AT-Pro???
gee sonny, I see you sold your f75 already!!!
February 26, 2011 02:11AM
Did you ever get the AT pro?