Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software used for this forum being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum based Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is no longer accepting new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences. This Phorum based discussion forum will still be here for reference and veiwing, but will be closed for further posts.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 - 28 of 28
I had it, did lots and lots of research and decided to go with the da vinci robot approach with surgeon who has done 11K procedures. Its been six years - knock on wood (yes still wood) and psa = zero
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Experienced users might disagree, but with very fast processors and cheap memory, why not have an interface where a user identifies a find (their own identifier or one chosen from a list (clad dime, silver quarter, etc, etc)) that gets stored with all relevant data (depth, vdi, etc, etc, etc,etc).
On a new target, the detector can compare the data of this new target against data in the stored
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Mfg website says "Ultra High Quality Audio (UHQA)" technology and makes no reference to APTX. Not listed as a APTX-LL product on aptx dot com .
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Agree. Thats what I said three posts ago.
-------------------------------------------------------
> newguy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Acekool website specs for bt517 shows csr8645 -
> cs
> > r8645 is not aptx-LL. Equinox wireless audio ind
> ic
> > ator shows a plus sign (+) when paired with aptx
> -L
>
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Acekool website specs for bt517 shows csr8645 - csr8645 is not aptx-LL. Equinox wireless audio indicator shows a plus sign (+) when paired with aptx-LL
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
The soundpeats are not aptx-LL - IMO, you don't need aptx-LL - I got these HBUDS that are aptx-hd - I have not noticed any lag - target is always at pinponter location
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I initially thought F75 was better, but after more use theres no doubt EQ600 is better and its not attributed to any of your lecture points.
-------------------------------------------------------
> (my apologies up front as I am not trying to rain
> on anyone's parades nor bring negativity, just bei
> ng real and truthful as I can)
>
> Well here I am, the reality kill
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not too busy.
> Restricted.
Tom, does that mean you can never update this list with Equinox info?-->
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Sold my original model F75 to buy Equinox 600
First impression during 2 hour hunt. Default Park 1 setting.
IMO/memory F75 had better vid recognition
Depth indicator on Equinox is useless because most times (20 +/-) targets, it showed maximum depth when targets were only 2-5 inches.
Florida soil
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
dewcon4414 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> newguy........ are you beach hunting or inland hun
> ting? Personally i see an advantage you might mi
> ss out on with the 600 if you are beach hunting.
> Freq matching and how all of them work together.
> We just havent seen a single bit of info for beach
> use yet. Still going to come down t
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom's dirt strata study. Conclusive analysis was achieved in May, 2000. The 1962 strata of dirt was located at 9.22" deep.
report located at this link.
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Thanks. I think ground in Central Florida is not mineralized. How would you use the 3 separate frequencies in non-mineralized ground? Would you use each of the frequencies over a given area to see what the results would be?
-----------------------------------------------------
> newguy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Please educate this
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Please educate this rookie. How would someone go about using the different frequencies in lets say a park/sports field. Would you first detect with 14Kz and then switch to 5 or 20 depending on what you hear/see in 14Kz? Or would you use a specific frequency based on the location and the type of targets you are searching for?
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes; however, I do see a very slight increase in
> folks performing micro-jewelry hunting. . . . .
> over the past few years; yet, still so minimal. I
> also see errors in methodology. Wrong
> sifter....... wrong detector....... wrong
> technique.................. so/hence.....still
> untapped.
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom,
In the 5th edition of the Fisher Intelligence report, you said hunting dry salt beaches for micro-jewelry was an untapped opportunity. Is that still true today?
thanks
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Hello Tom,
I'm new. Can you please update this list for 1Q2016?
Regards
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gold Bug-2.........hands down...........for
> micro-jewelry hunting and for medium & light
> mineralization prospecting.
>
> Minelab GPX-4500 (w/DD coil) for high
> mineralization dirt prospecting.
>
> F75 LTD for relic hun
by
newguy
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum