Show all posts by user
This Open Forum is now DISABLE to new posts due to the "Phorum" Forum Software used for this forum being generally obsolete and basically no longer supported. Recently, the server that hosts this website upgraded to MySQL version 8.0.36 and Phorum 5.2.23 is not compatible with MySQL version 8.0.36. This Phorum based Discussion Forum will still be available for viewing and reference but is no longer accepting new postings and will be READ ONLY. To visit the NEW forum, CLICK HERE! Please note that those wishing to use the NEW Discussion Forum will have to re-sign up. Due to encryption of passwords, I cannot transfer users from the Phorum platform to the new forum platform. I am sorry for all the inconveniences. This Phorum based discussion forum will still be here for reference and veiwing, but will be closed for further posts.
This forum is currently read only. You can not log in or make any changes. This is a temporary situation.
Quick airtest indoors, ML15" vs Coiltek on low, mid and high conductors.
Factory reset, volume 25, 2 tone to keep it simple.
Don't hate me, take it with a pinch of salt, your miles may vary and all that good stuff!
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
EL NINO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ghound ... Thank you for the information about thi
> s test of yours ...,
> I have one question .. on what recovery speed di
> d both coils be able to detect a copper VIC Penny
> at a depth of 12 inches?
>
> And what results did you get in the test on the si
> lver 1/4 hammered?
> Anothe
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
My 15" arrived today.
What i was hoping from the coil was the same performance in sensitively as the ML 15" coil with maybe a bit more depth on coins.
An air test (love or hate them) showed little to no difference between them on coins.
After a run around my coin garden i defo think the ML coil performed better.
The deepest coin i have is a big Viccy copper at 12", it's si
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I defo think the Nox is the best on picking out these little cut coins on old pastures upto the 7"-8" mark.
I find it very accurate in its audio on these targets and you can with at least with some confidence know the target is going to read the same out of the hole once dug.
With most other detectors I've used the ID/audio would be bouncing and giving such a scratchy mixed iron
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Personally I've never came across surface coins and nails, closest would be ploughed ground, so not a scenario I'd be testing my detector for to be honest.
I have found plenty of old coins above, below and in the vicinity of iron with the Nox though, especially low to mid conducing silver one's.
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Tom_in_CA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bayard Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >... we're living in a narrow
> > window of time when silver coins can be found wi
> th
> > metal detectors. It's temporary. Enjoy it whil
> e
> > it lasts, ....
>
> How do you
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
NASA-Tom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ghound......... That would be a dream-come-true...
> .... if I had that sink-rate here....in wet boggy/
> soggy Florida!
>
> Numerous times....... and independent of each othe
> r....... I've had Archaeologists state/tell me: "L
> ife begins at 1-Meter deep".
It sounds a dream
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I've had a few GM's, and my daughter has the GM one 15khz.
There great detectors, tough coils, well made, super in iron etc there more relic detectors than park hunters.
Warranty repairs would be your biggest concern.
My daughters GM kicks my Nox on Monty's nailboard test with a high conductor coin and near identical size.
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
possum mo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cal, I no longer have it, so I don't remember all
> the examples. I was a coin hunter, not into relics
> .
> Iron produced a lot of weird designs, where as a c
> oin was usually a single line from bottom to top.
> A deep coin would make a tiny short line, a shallo
> wer coin a taller line.
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
I thought the MFD was a very good detector, it just lacked the ability it work in iron and would feel dated now compared to an Equinox in usability.
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Originally he done the test with iron audio on, I believe Monty contacted him to say he should try the test again with iron audio off in zero mode, but it made little difference in the iron nail test.
The Apex costs £520 in the UK, that's more than the Vanquish pro pack or a Simplex, and I can understand their worry that it doesn't seem to be any better than either of them, and it
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Just watched a vid of the Apex on coke, it was reading an ID of 37 which falls into the Apex's "ferrous and very low conductivity range" of 35-45.
This would be a worry, as this is probably the same range your going to find small cut silver and gold hammered coins!
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum
Old dogs new tricks lol
The Nox excels with stock coil, and the 15" adds another dimension, but don't think Monty is a fan of large coils in iron.
by
ghound
-
Thomas Dankowski Metal Detecting Forum